Iterative Resilience: Synchronizing Dynamic Landscapes with Responsive Architectural Systems

Meredith Sattler, Louisiana State University

The Disaster-Rebuild-Disaster Cycle

On September 1st, 2008 six foot waves hit Grand Isle, Louisiana, destroying numerous buildings in their path. Caused by Hurricane Gustav, the storm surge rolled right over most of this seven foot high barrier island. This storm, the sixteenth to cause major damage to buildings and infrastructure on Grand Isle since the 1893 hurricane (which killed nearly 2,000 people with 130mph winds and 16ft storm surge), not only devastated the island, but shifted its entire landmass northeast. A week later, Hurricane Ike made landfall, delivering another round of destruction (see Figure 1).

Figure 1: Grand Isle is 7’ Above Sea Level at its Highest Point
On a typical day (above) most of Grand Isle’s land mass is within feet of sea level, but maintains defined boundaries between land and water. After Hurricanes Gustav and Ike (below), those boundaries dissolved as water and sand penetrated into the interior of the island. U.S. Highway 1 is seen here completely inundated with former beach sand (from the left side of the image).

Between major hurricanes, Grand Isle is hit by smaller storms on average every 2.2 years,i rendering it a particularly challenging geography for permanent occupation. Yet close to 1,300 people still insist on calling the island home, and thousands choose to vacation there. Historically, Grand Isle was an island paradise full of orange groves, exotic birds, and resort hotels where wealthy New Orleanians would escape summer malaria-transmitting mosquitos. Today, people are drawn to the island by its relatively cool offshore summer breeze, abundant fishing and crabbing, and its beach, the only “resort beach” in the state. It is as close to an island paradise as one gets in Louisiana.

But this paradise of devastating forces, unstable ground, and cyclical change is one where residents experience geologic time unfolding in seasons, not centuries (see Figure 2). Under the assault of these forces, structures and infrastructures that typically last decades are rendered temporary. The environment demands an alternative architecture, one that can mitigate and adapt to the island’s fluctuating conditions. By developing a prefabricated, mobile architectural system, deployed seasonally by gantry cranes, we create an adaptive, resilient solution to shifting sedimentation and settlement patterns on Grand Isle. This solution generates a contextually sensitive form of permanent habitation while simultaneously breaking the “Disaster-Rebuild-Disaster” hurricane cycle that much of the delta, with the assistance of FEMA, currently engages.

Figure 2: Grand Isle is Dynamic in Plan and Section Due to repetitive flooding and steadily increasing sea levels (attributed to climate change) Grand Isle’s physical morphology continually shifts. Flooding creates a sectional condition of extreme instability, where water occupies elevations from sea level to 22’ above sea level. In plan, as the western end of the 7-mile island grows thinner due to land loss, land accretion is occurring on the south-eastern end, causing an apparent “rotation” of the landmass. The combination of unstable soils, typical barrier island migration, and hurricane forces require a reconceptualization of architecture and its relationship to the groundplane.

The Risk - Time Relationship

Risk of storm damage is determined by a probability known as “recurrence interval”: the chance of being hit by a certain magnitude of storm within a certain amount of time. Based on recurrence interval terminology, it might appear that a “100-year storm” would be a storm that happens only once in every one hundred years, which is somewhat misleading. In actuality, it is the chance that a certain severity of storm, determined by historical data for that geography, would occur once within a one hundred year period; in other words, that a storm of that magnitude would have a one percent chance of occurring in any year. This results in a building having a twenty-six percent chance of flooding during a thirty year period (the life of a mortgage). 100-year storms can occur in consecutive years, and can occur multiple times within a one hundred year period.ii

Recurrence intervals are utilized to determine the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM’s) which specify Base Flood Elevations (BFE’s) for 100-year storm events in specific geographies. BFEs are minimum recommended lowest floor elevations for buildings, taking into account storm surge wave heights and stillwater flood elevations. However, in order for many coastal communities to qualify for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), their buildings must be elevated higher than the BFE. This elevation is called the Design Flood Elevation (DFE) and consists of the BFE height plus “freeboard” which is either two feet or a somewhat arbitrarily determined additional number of feet added to BFE for good measure.

In order to achieve DFE, traditional coastal construction practices place buildings on piles which elevate them above floodwaters, in particular, the devastating high-energy storm surge caused by hurricanes. It is well documented that most structures hit by the intense wave energy of storm surge at or above their lowest floorplate are no longer structurally sound, rendering proper DFE elevations critical for breaking the disaster-rebuild-disaster cycle. In almost all cases, it is too costly to build low enough and strong enough to withstand storm surge loads.

Ironically, recently Louisiana updated its wind building code requirements. On Grand Isle, buildings must now be built to withstand 147 MPH winds.iii However, flood code has not been revised to the same standards, so many structures are destroyed by flood long before the winds ever reach critical strength, rendering the extra labor, material and expense unnecessary.

Inspired by the above, our team examined FEMA and ACSE’s methodologies utilized to generate existing modeled flood elevation heights and BFE’s. We reconstructed the 700- and 1700- year flood elevations for Grand Isle using existing data from Flood Insurance Studies (FIS) and Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMS, effective date of Grand Isle FIRM and FIS is March 23, 1995) provided by FEMA. We then re-model flood elevation heights using extreme value functions and came to the conclusion that the current BFE’s for Grand Isle are misleadingly low, in some cases as much as nine feet too low (see bottom of Figure 2). Based on our findings, we developed a new methodology that more accurately determines flood elevations for higher flood levels and longer return periods (see Figure 3). This results in buildings which are far more likely to flood than the specified one percent probability per year, leading to dangerous misconceptions regarding risk.

Figure 3: Determining the Design Flood Elevation (DFE) The DFE is the elevation to which buildings in the regulatory floodplain are built. The minimum requirement for this elevation in NFIP communities is the Base Flood Elevation (BFE). In areas where a higher degree of protection is promoted or required, a freeboard is added; in this case, the DFE is some height (1, 2, or more feet) above the BFE.

Cyclical Scales of Destruction and Occupation

Grand Isle is particularly subject to dramatic temporal variation on two distinct cyclical scales. Hurricanes only appear in season, from June 1st to November 30th, but their probable trajectories cycle on a much longer duration. The Gulf of Mexico receives a concentration of direct hits approximately ten years out of every thirty. Within the Gulf, Grand Isle has consistently been targeted by dramatic storm events. Because of its location within the Gulf-bowl, and the fact that it is a barrier island, it gets hit first and hardest, resulting in an increase in permanent populations for approximately twenty-five years which then drops dramatically toward the end of each thirty year cycle. Depending on the number of structures that sustain massive damage, and the amount of land lost, this can result in an abundance of derelict properties.

Because Grand Isle is a summertime tourist destination, its temporary population bulges between May and November. This bulge balloons during the International Tarpon Rodeo, the oldest fishing tournament in the United Statesiv, where typically the population increases twenty-fold near the end of July. Ironically, late summer is also the time when hurricanes are most active, creating a potentially disastrous situation in which the island population is at its greatest during the time of maximum probability of hurricane hits. It is during this time that the community is most vulnerable economically as well: most of the annual income is generated while hurricane risk is highest.

With the Landscape, the Built Environment Must Move

In addition to the event driven cycles of “pulsing” disturbances described above, Grand Isle experiences long-term and persistent land loss due to the chronic “pressing” disturbances of subsidence, erosion, and deposition.v Consistent with all barrier islands, Grand Isle is migrating. Storm events roll the island northward with dramatic speed. Daily tidal shift and Gulf currents gently push the island northeast.

Grand Isle’s “land” is composed of loose particulates usually referred to as sand, but in this case, the particulates are composed of deposited Mississippi River sediment which originated in the fertile organic prairie soils of the North American breadbasket. Often referred to as silt or sediment they are the consistency of soft snow, and require saturation in water or plant roots for stability and structure. This sediment cannot be considered terra firma as it does not naturally bind together; it is extremely porous, and regularly swells and shrinks with water saturation. This localized shrinking is exacerbated by regional subsidence, the decomposition and compression of deltaic sediments under their own weight. Between localized shrinking and regional subsidence, it is estimated that subsidence rates can be as high as several millimeters per year.vi

The sinking land is further exacerbated by sea level rise, which is regionally higher than global averages in Grand Isle. As the land sinks, the water rises, and the sediments dissolve away. The island loses coastline on all sides except the southeastern-most corner, where deposition is extremely active. This pattern of movement makes the island appear to rotate clockwise.

Thus Grand Isle is in constant motion. Waters roll the island northeast and rotate its landmass in the x,y axis. High energy storm winds and water shift the occupiable elevation of the island in the z axis during hurricane season. The island is adrift in both plan and section.

Grand Isle’s spatial and temporal land-shifting stresses traditional fixed construction methodologies. Piles, cast into a slab of concrete, are a common foundation strategy on Grand Isle. This method facilitates a degree of structural stability, with the bonus of creating living space/driveway underneath, but is subject to intense scouring during storm events. These uprooted shelves of concrete unintentionally index and measure the continually fluctuating landscape. In this environment, it is necessary to utilize the landscape’s natural patterns and processes to determine architectural design parameters.

Resource Extraction

Resource extraction has driven the settlement of the southern Louisiana Delta, in spite of its inhospitable geography. For hundreds of years the estuary has proved one of the richest sources of seafood, oil, natural gas, and other products that have come in and out of use. Specialized equipment and tools have been invented and iterated to mine these resources and to deal with the challenging environmental conditions, creating a rich toolkit from which the project draws.

Today, the delta is populated with these specialized manmade structures and devices that exist predominantly at two scales: landscape and human. The Army Corps of Engineers flood control structures are typically massive ribbons of concrete inserted into profiles of the landscape. Oil and Gas rigs, jack-barges and stacks penetrate the sky; the equivalents of massive skyscrapers in the delta’s saturated flats. The shipping industry’s trans-oceanic tankers are small floating cities, and the bridges that facilitate auto travel across water bodies on which they float are high, necessary to provide clearance for these large nautical vessels.

These massive landscape elements are juxtaposed against modest family homes in small fishing villages which still bear the name of their founding ancestors. There is a “normal” scalar relationship in the delta, the result of an intensely working landscape, that does not occur many other places in the developed world. It is into this world of super and sub sized elements that the Gantry Crane becomes the logical insertion, facilitating a new architecture of iterative resilience. It is its intermediate scale that links the small, remotely prefabricated residential units to the rhythm of the shifting landscape that becomes their home.

A New System of Habitation Requires a New Settlement Pattern

Today, when coastline in Louisiana is submerged, the property rights are taken by the State, resulting in property owners simply losing their land. We propose that going forward, Grand Isle’s property holdings will be converted to a percentage-performance based system which can maintain property and values in a shifting landscape, and away from a geographically based prescriptive system, which cannot. In order to achieve land ownership equity and equality on this shifting island, we propose that property holding will be frozen on a specific day (to be determined). On that day, the exact landmass of the island will be determined via survey, and property owners will transfer their exact plots into a percentage of ownership of the overall island. From that day forward, each owner will hold a percent of land on the island, not a specific plot of land. Subsequently, as the island shifts, property lines will adjust, parametrically shifting to maintain ownership percentages island-wide, while not necessarily maintaining originally purchased plots.

Simultaneously, we propose a “pile grid” plan be established based on existing conditions. This precise grid would be twelve foot by twelve foot on center, and is designed to support new residential unit modules. No new traditional coastal construction will occur on the island; as older residences are destroyed or abandoned, they will be fazed out and converted to the new prefab modular system that utilizes the pile grid. This way, slowly the island’s grid is built up and occupied. Because it is uniform island-wide, the pile grid facilitates shifting property lines and forgives shifting landscape features: residences can easily be moved up and down, and over one grid square at a time, so that all can keep their residence on (above) their current land holding. As the residence units shift, and the landscape moves, an index of pile grid remains, visibly measuring the change.

In traditional residential coastal construction scenarios first piles are driven and then the concrete slab is poured. The lowest floorplate is built as a rigid structure, then attached to the pile-foundation with rigid connections. The attachment point is predetermined at a DFE elevation above the BFE and the rest of the house is framed via conventional construction techniques. In a severe storm event, if the building is subject to a storm surge hit at or above the lowest floorplate it will suffer enough structural damage to be rendered uninhabitable, and must be rebuilt. If demolished and rebuilt, the new structure will likely be placed on or near the footprint of the prior structure, and will often be rebuilt stronger and higher. In the event that this new building survives the next major storm event, and the coastline below it is permanently submerged, the state takes the land and the building must be demolished (see Figure 4).

Figure 4. Breaking the Disaster-Rebuild-Disaster Cycle
The mobile modular method utilizes pile grid logic in conjunction with the Gantry Crane to shift residence locations in both plan and section in relation to the transforming landscape of Grand Isle.

In contrast, the proposed pile grid system facilitates utilization of x, y and z axis logic. We start with a longer (higher) pile to increase the modules elevation options, and allow for them to be lifted above predicted storm surge heights. In the iterative resilience construction scenario, the grid piles are driven in island pre-determined locations. The Gantry Crane delivers the units, one by one, and attaches them to the grid at the appropriate height. When out of hurricane season, the units are configured low to the ground, stair stepping up to take advantage of views and breezes, while still maintaining connection to the groundplane. At the beginning of hurricane season, the Gantry Crane lifts the units into their storm ready position, well above the BFE, and in-line. Additional stair units and intermediary decks are attached to connect the units to the ground. In their elevated position, the units weather the storm above the surge, and are ready to be lowered again once the season ends. Similar to the scenario above, this next storm event may take out the coastline. In this event, all property lines on the island are adjusted, and the units are rolled back in the grid, realigning with the moving landmass. At the beginning of the next hurricane season, all other residences adjust accordingly, so the settlement pattern rolls with the natural movement of the island (see Figure 4).

Once new units fabrication is complete, they are delivered via small ships and received at the harbor located on the northeast end of the island. There they are off-loaded by Gantry Crane and directly transported, via new Gantry Crane roads, to site. These Gantry Crane roads are a shared system of crane/bike/pedestrian circulation that is placed within the pile grid to facilitate non-automobile movement around the island. This circulation network introduces novel transverse connectivity across the island from bay to Gulf.

Through time, development on the island is slowly concentrated onto the highest ground, which is also the pivot point of the island’s rotation, near its center. Non-development zones, geographies which would result in quick taking by the state, are expanded. Some of this land becomes vegetated buffer zones/water conveyance systems that are developed along the island’s longitudinal edges in order to stabilize edges and move water from higher ground, when necessary.

A New System of Habitation

In a landscape whose composition is as much water as “land” it is necessary to reexamine habitation through the lens of nautical architecture in order to utilize the intelligence of its performative characteristics. As discussed above, the aqueous conditions in the southern Louisiana delta has fostered a robust tradition of retooling marine forms, adapting them to shallow waters and high-energy forces. Tapping into specialized local knowledge, labor, resources, and modes of transport is strategic in this remote geography, resulting in an overall increase in the residential system’s resiliency.

We propose that the modular housing units are produced within existing shipbuilding facilities because they specialize in large force/water-tight construction. Units would deliver directly from factory to site via boat. Historically, there have been large ferrocement shipbuilders in both the nearby ports of Mobile, Alabama (F.F. Ley and Co.) and Houston, Texas (McCloskey and Co),vii in addition to smaller shops scattered across the Gulf. With some retooling, shipbuilders in the region have the facilities and knowledge to manufacture these units.

Once complete, delivery utilizing marine transport directly from shipbuilder-manufacturers to Grand Isle, is highly efficient both in terms of fuel usage and logistics. The island has a sizable marina where the units will be off-loaded by one of three dedicated gantry cranes, which then delivers them to nearby storage, or directly to site.

The residential units are timber framed shells, built in compliance with the latest hurricane wind code standards, and sheathed in ferrocement, which is inexpensive and highly durable in maritime conditions. This structural shell is analogous to a ferrocement boat hull, rotated one hundred and eighty degrees along the z-axis, and sealed onto the unit floorplate-deck; essentially creating an up-side-down boat. It is highly resistant to transferring wind and water to the interior and tends to buckle, not crack or tear apart, when put under failure inducing stresses. The shell shape is that of a simple gabled roof house (without overhangs that catch wind updrafts that lead to roof uplift) which reference much of the current housing stock on the island (see Figure 5). Ferrocement takes paint beautifully, so units can be colored to match the bright and pastel pallets typical of Grand Isle residences.

Figure 5. Mobile Modular Unit Construction and Attachments Take Inspiration from Maritime Methodologies
Lightweight and resilient ferrocement boat hull technology is adapted to create a solid structural shell, resistant to hurricane forces. Apertures are secured with a layered storm shutter system that unfolds to embrace the idyllic natural environment of Grand Isle. When hurricanes arrive, the building transforms: retreating/repackaging itself by refolding.

Apertures in the rigid shell are sheathed in operable, folding layers, analogous to hurricane shutter systems. The main views and source of breezes on the island are toward the Gulf, and secondarily toward the bay, so the largest apertures and adjoining outdoor deck spaces are oriented accordingly. These spaces literally fold-out into the idyllic natural environment via sets of hangar doors, hinging decks, and railings, creating an expanded hybrid interior-exterior living space. But they are shipped, and weather storms, in their folded/closed position (see Figure 6).

Figure 6. A Mobile, Modular Architecture Facilitated by the Gantry Crane
Three module types (kitchen, living/bath, bedroom), linked by interior and exterior circulation, can be configured in multiple arrangements.

Once on-site, units are positioned into the twelve foot by twelve foot pile grid with the precise controls of the gantry crane, the height of the unit depends on the season and the site’s DFE. The units are attached to the pilegrid via an adapted mast-clamp friction style connector with a steel pin that runs through the pile. These customized adjustable connectors, in combination with the folding apertures and decks, constitute the soft-adaptable components of the system which contrast the hard-fixed shell component. Both are necessary to withstand the temporal and energetic fluctuations of hurricanes.

Once installed, adjustable stair units are attached, then the unit decks, and finally the unit apertures unfold, literally blossoming into their living configuration. Twice annually, at the beginning and end of hurricane season, the units are re-folded and their heights repositioned. At the start of the season, units are raised above the BFE, to the DFE, where they will remain high above destructive storm surge forces (somewhere between fourteen and twenty-two feet depending on specific Grand Isle location). The units are floating, almost inline, with one stair tread of elevation difference between them. After the season finishes, units are dropped down and staggered to facilitate ease of use and connection to the groundplane. The lowest unit sits five feet above the ground, and each unit stacks an additional three feet above the one adjacent to it. Sets of accordion stairs slide out to facilitate circulation.

There are three unit types which can be configured in various ways: kitchen, living/bath, and bedroom. Each is sandwiched between decks which increase square footage and provide additional circulation: the larger deck expands living space via sets of hangar style doors which fold up to free the groundplane and provide overhang shade, while the smaller deck is used mainly for circulation. Kitchen units are equipped with island bar-style seating, refrigerator, electric stove, running water/wastewater disposal, small on-demand electric hot water heater, and exhaust fan. Living/bath units have a vestibule space for sofa or chairs which opens directly out onto the large deck, and a bath that contains running water/wastewater disposal, small on-demand electric hot water heater, and exhaust fan. Bedroom units are equipped with an exhaust fan and electrical outlets.

Since Grand Isle is remote, and has one of the most temperate climates in Louisiana, every attempt has been made to reduce active environmental control system loads via bioclimactic strategies. This not only promotes sustainable consumption, but is also a strategy for resilience, as grid power is not often reliable, especially during storm events.

Units are typically grouped into 3-packs or 6-packs. A 3-pack is designed for a couple or single and contains one kitchen, one living/bath, and one bedroom unit. A 6-pack is designed for a larger family and can be configured according to the individual family’s needs. The 6-pack unit includes a large common deck space between the two rows of units. Additional platform-deck and stair units can easily be added into the system, increasing living space, circulation, and connection to the outdoors (see Figure 6).

Iterative Resilience

Traditional buildings operate as fixed elements within dynamic landscapes that weather, and ultimately destroy them. As our global climate continues to change at an increasingly rapid rate, it becomes harder to predict what types and severity of weathering will occur at which locations across the globe, and ultimately how this weathering will affect buildings. The dynamic coastline of Grand Isle provides an ideal test geography for future coastal conditions because its local sea-level rise rates are greater than the global average (now estimated at over 3.1 mm annually.viii) Additionally, its fluctuating barrier island coastline condition, and regular exposure to dramatic storm events, allows us to experience geologic time in less than a generation, providing key data about how buildings perform in these conditions. These generate circumstances with which we can build scenarios and speculate about how necessary new forms of architecture might behave within these conditions.

Through a year of scenario building and design speculation, we have found that mobile prefabricated structures, linked to an infrastructure capable of regular relocation in x, y, and z axes, provides a necessary spatial-temporal linked solution. Utilizing inspiration from nautical architecture, the units can be built at regional shipbuilders, shipped to site, and positioned to withstand storms, while simultaneously responding to local island vernacular character. As the units shift across the expanding grid of friction-pile structural foundations, readjusting their location relative to the transforming landscape, they “nestle” into post-disturbance configurations leaving a pile-forest index of their former positions; an index of the former land. This adaptable modular design creates an integrated built environment, in an unforgiving landscape, expanding architectural scope and agency through the process of reconfiguration.

Project Team:

Dr. Carol Friedland, Assistant Professor of Construction Management
Meredith Sattler, Assistant Professor of Architecture
Dr. Lynne Carter, Southern Climate Impacts Planning Program, Coastal Sustainability Studio
Dr. Melanie Gall, Department of Geography & Anthropology
Elizabeth Chisolm, PhD student in Engineering Science
Frank Bohn, Graduate student in Construction Management
Ben Buehrle, Graduate student in School of Architecture
Carolina Rodriguez, Undergraduate student in School of Architecture
Megan Harris, Undergraduate student in School of Architecture
Elsy Interiano, Undergraduate student in School of Landscape Architecture

i “Grand Isle History,” Hurricane City, accessed August 18, 2012, http://www.hurricanecity.com/city/grandisle.htm.

ii Federal Emergency Management Agency, Coastal Construction Manual FEMA P-55 (2011): 1, 6-4, accessed February 2, 2012, http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?fromSearch=fromsearch&id=1671.

iii “Wind Speed By Parish,” Department of Public Safety, Louisiana State Uniform Construction Code Council, accessed August 20, 2012, http://lsuccc.dps.louisiana.gov/pdf/parishes/Jefferson.pdf

iv “Grand Isle Tarpon Rodeo,” accessed January 25, 2012, http://tarponrodeo.org/GITR/Home.html.

v Scott Collins, et al., “An Integrated Conceptual Framework for Long-Term Social-Ecological Research,” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment: 2011; 9(6): 351–357, accessed December 9, 2012, doi: 10 1890/100068.

vi T.A. Meckel, U.S. ten Brink, S. Jeffress Williams, “Current Subsidence Rates due to Compaction of Holocene Sediments in Southern Louisiana,” Geophysical Research Letters: 2006; 33(L11403).

vii “The Ferro-Concrete Builders List,” accessed August 22, 2012, http://www.mareud.com/Ferro-Concrete/f-c-list.htm.

viii Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Fourth Synthesis Assessment Report: Climate Change (Geneva: IPCC Secretariat, 2007), accessed August 20, 2012, http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/syr/en/contents.html.

Human-environment-technology interactions and the lower Mississippi River delta

Assistant Professor of Sustainability, Meredith Sattler, is conducting research on human-environment-technology interactions within the constructed system of the lower Mississippi River delta. Pursued simultaneously through nested design studios, seminars, and independent scholarly research, this work has been supported by the LSU Coastal Sustainability Studio (CSS), a University-wide research initiative focusing on collaborative trans-disciplinary proposals for coastal Louisiana geographies. Through the studio, faculty and students from the Schools of The Coast and the Environment, Earth Sciences, Renewable and Natural Resources, Engineering, Architecture, Landscape Architecture, Law, Economics, Geology, Geography and Anthropology collaborate on regional to community scale research. Her work through the CSS is part of a larger research trajectory examining methodologies and implications of designing within complex constructed environmental systems.

As a follow-up to her 2011 presentation at the ARCC Conference “Learning from Lafitte: An Interdisciplinary Place-based Approach to Architectural Research and Education, which mated an NSF funded Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) framework with the 1977 Venturi, Scott Brown, Izenour research methodology developed in “Learning from Las Vegas,” she and her students presented their findings to the City Council of Lafitte, Louisiana. Numerous strategies for designing built infrastructures that adapt to fluctuating water levels, which emphasize the integration of ecological and socio-cultural dynamics, time, and feedback loops (essential considerations within the dynamic deltaic system, but often overlooked), were presented to suggest that long-term resilience may not be possible relying entirely on structural (levee) flood control mechanisms. A set of design proposals tailored to the geography were also presented, which catalyzed an engaging discussion about the trade-offs between structural and non-structural flood protection infrastructures. Recently, Lafitte received news that their ring-levee proposal was not included in the State of Louisiana 2012 Coastal Master Plan, which means the town will have to self-fund their proposed ring-levee, or re-consider alternative flood control measures similar to those developed as part of the research trajectory.

In the last year, she continued to advance this work through a collaboration with Carol Friedland, Assistant Professor of Construction Management, and a team of trans-disciplinary students, where they examined the relationship of flood depths, building codes and community sustainability. The project was initiated by the realization that currently, two regulated standards guide building design in coastal areas:  one set protects against flood events and the other protects against wind events. Under these divergent standards a normal building (e.g. home or business) experiences a 45% probability of being destroyed by a flood that exceeds its designed expected life,i while the same building faces only an 8% probability of being destroyed by a wind speed that exceeds its designed expected lifeii

Storm surge is the single most destructive force to buildings; currently, it is not economically feasible to construct buildings to withstand these flood loads, the only viable alternative is to elevate buildings above the surge. In response, she and her team developed a new methodology that more accurately determine flood elevations for higher flood levels and longer return periods and then utilized these new design elevations to project possible sustainable and resilient community design solutions for Grand Isle, and other vulnerable coastal communities. The design embraces, rather than ignores, natural cyclical disturbances. Through testing the architectural implications of their teams’ flood elevations in context they proposed a community transformation responsive to landscape changes typical of barrier islands.

 

Images were created with the assistance of LSU Architecture student Carolina Rodriguez and Landscape Architecture student Elsy Interiano

Prof. Sattler is currently working on an analysis of the State of Louisiana 2012 Coastal Master Plan development process and is examining points of contact between sustainable design frameworks and the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. This research is supported by the State of Louisiana Board of Regents.

(i) Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2006). “Recommended residential construction for the Gulf coast.” Rep. FEMA P-550, Washington, DC.

(ii) ASCE. (2010). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” ASCE, Reston, VA, 7–10.

(iii) Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2009). Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, flood model: HAZUS–MH MR4 technical manual, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC.

 

New Book: Stewardship of the Built Environment: Sustainability, Preservation and Reuse

Robert A. Young, Professor of Architecture at the University of Utah College of Architecture + Planning, has written Stewardship of the Built Environment: Sustainability, Preservation and Reuse (Island Press, 2012) which explores the social, environmental, and economic sustainability of preserving and reusing existing buildings.  Professor Young’s first book, Historic Preservation Technology (Wiley, 2008), was recently included on the National Trust for Historic Preservation’s “Essential Preservation Reading List” and was subsequently cited by The Atlantic Cities as one of the “10 Most Compelling Historic Preservation Reads”.

UTSA Architecture Researchers Study Sustainability in San Antonio Neighborhoods

A team of researchers and students led by Associate Professor Hazem Rashed-Ali at The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA) College of Architecture has partnered with the City of San Antonio’s Office of Environmental Policy to study sustainability throughout San Antonio. Their Neighborhood Sustainability Index offers a baseline comparison of key performance indicators outlined in the SA 2020 and Mission Verde plans.

Rashed-Ali and his team collected existing GIS data from a variety of city agencies and other organizations in San Antonio to develop the Neighborhood Sustainability Index. They studied 29 sustainability indicators for each of 275 neighborhoods in San Antonio then pared down those indicators into seven sustainability indices: environmental impact, transportation choices, housing equity, supporting existing communities, valuing communities, economic competitiveness and leveraging federal investments. Finally, they used the indices to develop the master Neighborhood Sustainability Index.

The development of this Neighborhood Sustainability Index will help planners, policy makers and other stakeholders evaluate the long-term environmental impacts of their decisions. Using the data, these different stakeholder groups can compare available planning alternatives, select optimum ones, develop new alternatives to address issues identified in the analysis and generally make more informed planning decisions.

Preliminary analysis of the study results showed an apparent correlation between the proximity of the zone to the down town area and its average Neighborhood Sustainability Index score. The maximum overall score was achieved by the Downtown neighborhood, followed by some of the neighborhoods immediately surrounding downtown, while the lowest scores were achieved by the lower density neighborhoods at the northern edge of the city. Detailed project results can be found on: http://sa-neighborhoodsustainability.org

The study was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant program and the City of San Antonio’s Office of Environmental Policy and conducted in partnership with the City of San Antonio Planning Department, VIA Metropolitan Transit, San Antonio Water System, the San Antonio River Authority, the San Antonio Bexar - County Metropolitan Planning Organization and the Bexar County Appraisal District.

Ball State and the Greening of Campus IX

Ball State

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
MEP Associates To Be Platinum Sponsor of Greening of the Campus IX
Worldʼs Largest Closed-loop Geothermal Heat System Designed By MEP Associates
To Be Dedicated On March 20 As Part of Event at Ball State University

Muncie, IN – February 23, 2012 — MEP Associates, a multi-disciplinary engineering consulting firm specializing in the design of complex facilities, will be the Platinum Sponsor for the Greening of the Campus Conference IX on March 18 to March 21. Hosted by Ball State University (BSU) in Muncie, Indiana, the Greening of the Campus Conference brings together more than 300 representatives from colleges and universities across the country.

MEP Associates is proud to have Jeff Urlaub, President and CEO and Mike Luster, senior
mechanical engineer, and the project manager of the geothermal project at BSU, present at Greening of the Campus on Tuesday, March 20, at 7:00 p.m., Eastern Time. The presentation is titled Campus Conversion to Geothermal – A Case Study: Ball State Universityʼs Conversion to a Campus Geothermal System.

Headquartered in Eau Claire, WI, MEP Associates led the design and construction of the nationʼs largest closed-loop geothermal heat pump system, which will be dedicated at Ball State on March 20, 2012. Geothermal heating and cooling uses the near-constant temperature of the earth starting approximately ten feet below the surface of the ground to assist with heating in winter months and cooling in summer months.

“Ball State University is a leading innovator of environmentally-centered initiatives in higher
education,” said Urlaub. “We are pleased to have led the design and construction of the geothermal system for Ball State and to support the University and its Greening of the Campus Conference.”

According to Mike Luster, PE, LEED AP, senior mechanical engineer at MEP Associates who led the project at Ball State, geothermal systems offer college and university campuses a number of benefits. Those include operational energy cost savings, reduced system maintenance and associated costs, avoided costs the for handling the ash that would otherwise result from burning coal as a fuel; and reductions of the carbon footprint that otherwise would result from the use of fossil fuels to heat and cool campus buildings.
At Ball State, the geothermal system will heat and cool all 45 buildings on the 660-acre campus.

The geothermal system is expected to save BSU approximately two million dollars per year in operating costs at todayʼs pricing and will insure future avoided costs for Carbon Taxing. The system will replace four coal-fired boilers and reduce the universityʼs net carbon footprint.

“Beyond the substantial economic and environmental benefits of this campus-wide installation, the geothermal project also is serving as a platform for field-based research and education,” said Professor Robert Koester, Director of the Center for Energy Research/Education/Service and Chair of the Council on the Environment at Ball State University. “Faculty and students are working across disciplinary boundaries; the university is connecting with its counterparts to share its findings; and our industry partners continue to help as we advance our collective understandings of the best practices in the use of this technology.”

BSU hosts Greening of the Campus March 18 to March 21 on the university campus in Muncie, Indiana. The four-day conference will draw two-year and four-year colleges and universities from the U.S. and abroad to examine trends in sustainability, advances in environmentally-centered practices for college campuses and trends in education for sustainability.

About Ball State University:
Founded in 1918, Ball State is a state-assisted residential university in Muncie, Indiana, and offers a wealth of academic opportunities, including about 180 undergraduate majors and pre-professional programs and more than 100 masterʼs and doctoral degrees. Programs in architecture, telecommunications, landscape architecture, education, entrepreneurship, and an online masterʼs degree in nursing are consistently ranked among the best in the nation. About 22,000 undergraduate and graduate students enroll each year in diverse academic programs on and off campus.

About MEP Associates:
MEP Associates, LLC, is a multi-disciplinary engineering consulting firm specializing in the design of complex facilities. Design services include geothermal, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, fire protection as well as commissioning services.

Media Contact for Ball State University:
Robert J. Koester AIA, LEED AP
Professor of Architecture
Director of Center for Energy Research/Education/Service
Ball State University
765.285.1135 office

Media Contact for MEP Associates:
Mike Luster, P.E. LEED AP
Senior Mechanical Engineer
Project Manager for the closed-loop geothermal system at Ball State University
507.281.6328 direct

Book Review: Integrated Sustainable Design

Hamilton, M. (2011). Integral Sustainable Design: Transformative Perspectives, by Mark DeKay [book review]. Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 6(3), 137-148.

INTEGRAL SUSTAINABLE DESIGN
Book Review
Marilyn Hamilton
Reviewed: DeKay, M. (2011). Integral Sustainable Design: Transformative Perspectives. Oxford, United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis Group Ltd.

Readers of Integral Sustainable Design are invited through a series of gates into an atrium of design studios each purposefully framed by integrally reflective questions. We wonder about the meaning of the structures we glimpse, and we re-evaluate our sense of the sloping levels of natural formations. We ponder the complexities of collective space, and we query the landscapes inside our minds as well as around the studios. Mark DeKay’s book works on the body, mind, heart, and soul as it serves three audiences—each captured in one word of its title. First, it guides scholars of Integral Theory through the principles of design. Second, the book helps students of sustainability appreciate the fundamentals of wholism, living systems, systems thinking, and ecology. Third, designers and students of design and architecture (the book’s primary audience) are introduced to the emerging field of Integral Design.

As one who is called in service to each element of the title through integral research and writing, teaching the principles of sustainable community development and designing projects, proposals, and curricula for the well-being of cities, I have been waiting for DeKay’s book with considerable anticipation. In fact, as author of Integral City: Evolutionary Intelligences for the Human Hive (2008), I wish that this book had been published before my own was written.

The Preface introduces the basics of Integral Theory. DeKay reveals his intention as a teacher of design and architecture with an integral view. His perspective reveals his prejudice that architecture entails and calls forth progressively more complex and more inclusive ways of practice. While the Preface might lead some readers to conclude that DeKay is elitist, the confession in the conclusion of Part 1 reveals his humility and vulnerability most ingenuously:

For me, the value of looking at design through an Integral lens has been that it has allowed me to glimpse areas of expertise that others have developed more than I have and to finally be able to honor them and include their valuable perspectives in my own work. As a result, it has also opened my eyes to the fact that the perspective that I have been steeped in for the past 25 years is also only partially true! Telling the whole story involves listening to and from others’ perspectives: cultural, individual, ecological as well as technical. Then each viewpoint takes its valuable and appropriate place in a wider perspective where nothing is missing—rich human experiences, significant cultural meaning, high technological performance and true ecological sense merge into something much richer, truer and ultimately more aesthetically pleasing. Welcome to the future of design! (p. 129)

I appreciated that each of the book’s four parts is consistently structured with an introduction and conclusion, so that I was provided a simple roadmap that allowed for exploration on multiple levels. Moreover, DeKay provides considerable substance for granular/high resolution reflection because of an abundance of well-annotated photographs, figures, and tables. In fact, it is such a beautiful book I couldn’t bear to mark it and it is now profusely marked with sticky notes to annotate its insights.

read the full review here

New Publication: Integral Sustainable Design by Mark DeKay

Integral Sustainable Design: transformative perspectives
by Mark DeKay (Earthscan/Routledge 2011)
Integrated Sustainable Design front cover
This is an important, timely and significant book. It brings Integral Theory to design in a simple but profound way. -Ken Wilber, author, The Integral Vision, the world’s most published and translated living philosopher

Integral Sustainable Design has been for me the single most important book on architecture I have ever read. It will be of interest to all manner of integralists and meta-theorists, will serve the world of sustainable design as a guiding manual, and for the non-expert can profoundly change one’s day to day experience of the built environments in which we can dwell. -Michael Schwartz (PhD, Columbia University), Professor of the History and Philosophy of Art, Augusta State University

From a forthcoming journal book review: In all respects, my expectations of DeKay’s work have been exceeded, and I wholeheartedly recommend this book to all those who seek a manifesto that meshes Integralism, Sustainability, and Design. -Marilyn Hamilton, author Integral City, from book review in the Journal of Integral Theory and Practice
(read the full book review here)

Every day I hear from architects, designers and students asking for advice on how and where they can begin to learn about and get involved in a much needed design revolution that goes beyond corporatist ideas of “green” and “sustainability.” Finally, I can point them to Mark DeKay’s new book, Integral Sustainable Design which provides the framework and perspective that people who feel the inadequacy of today’s design practice and theory can relate to and from which they can learn. - Sim Van der Ryn, author Ecological Design and Design for Life, Former State Architect, California

Integral Sustainable Design presents a holistic theoretical framework, which both encompasses and integrates all the perspectives and disciplines that must be considered if we are to create a sustainable society worth sustaining. It could well turn out to be the most important book yet published on sustainable design. - Gary J. Coates, Victor L. Regnier Distinguished Faculty Chair, Department of Architecture, Kansas State University; author of The Architecture of Carl Nyrén, Erik Asmussen, Architect, and Resettling America: Energy, Ecology and Community

Integral Sustainable Design gives designers a pragmatic and powerful process by which to make explicit the experiential and cultural dimensions so often left out of the common approaches to design. Both the design community at large and students of Integral Theory in other contexts will find DeKay’s volume of great value. Timely, quite unique, and much needed! - Sean Esbjörn-Hargens, Ph.D., John F. Kennedy University, co-author of Integral Ecology and editor of Integral Theory in Action